February 1, 2010 Issue

   
 

Wolves: Winning?

Read More

Send a Letter to
the Editor

Tell us what you think
Comment



Putting the park in parking


   February 2010>
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      


B.B. King and Buddy guy

Saturday, February 20th

8:00pm

Swedish Exercise: Free Trial Class

Tuesday, March 2nd

9:15am





Photo by Michele Manske

CVS Pharmacy at 11th & Hennepin.

Get rid of the fake windows

10 Comments

It's clear that as a society we have been asleep at the wheel about a lot of things for a long time. Today's topic: The environments we create and, specifically, the fake-window syndrome. This syndrome is closely related to the blank-wall syndrome but more insidious. Blank walls don't pretend to be anything other than barriers that separate spaces and keep people in or out. Fake windows deceive our perceptions and rob us of vital urban experiences.

This is a syndrome that has emerged in recent years as suburban chains have inserted themselves into urban environments. It is a condition that is familiar to people who walk in urban areas. It is familiar at the experiential level but not necessarily at the conscious level. It is my intention to make this problem conscious so that we can make better decisions about our built environments and our shared future.

To understand this issue, it is important to see how economic agendas manifest in physical form. Corporate chains have catered to the suburban market for a few decades now, utilizing an auto-oriented model. This model inadvertently creates and reinforces a sense of isolation and separation. This way of building proliferated for decades. However, even prior to the recent collapse of financial and investment systems, developers began questioning this pattern and started warming up to more pedestrian-oriented models. Our citizenry had begun craving reconnection — connection to place and to other people — and suburbanites began speaking with their feet, literally, and started moving to the inner city.

Now with the current state of the economy there is a grave sense of uncertainty and insecurity about how to proceed, with many sensing that business as usual is not necessarily the solution. We are on high alert. Embedded in this crisis are the solutions. We must look at what we have created and determine what does and does not work. In the case of our built environments, positive, vital pedestrian environments generally work. They are not only visually interesting, they offer an experience that is based on connection and place. We know what these places feel like — they are welcoming, interesting and often inspirational. It's really not too much to ask that our environments inspire us!

CVS, on the other hand, is taking the anti-pedestrian environment to an extreme. A review of three of their urban locations (11th & Hennepin, Franklin & Nicollet and Oxford & Grand in St. Paul) yields at least 10 different ways to block windows or in other ways destroy an interior-exterior connection and a sense of street vitality and safety. As you walk by these stores, here's the view: The backside of display shelves, blank walls built into the windows, blinds pulled all the way down, film over the windows, walls built into the windows with generic advertising on them, a view into a poorly organized storeroom, a view into the chaos of the backside of sinks and counters in the photo area, a wall with a shelf of gift bags stuffed with tissue paper (how symbolic — empty gift bags), a wall with a shelf of teddy bears with their backs to the street, and the crowning jewel is a display of once lovely prints, now an eerie green as the red ink fades, of the lost historic urban streetscape. I take this last one as the ultimate insult to the Grand Avenue community — a reminder of what has been deleted from their lives.

In these examples, the window has been exploited in its crudest and emptiest form — as an image, not as an experience. It is window as wall, not window as view. Windows are about views into and out of buildings. Windows are about natural light; windows can even still be about air. Windows should not be visual barriers that reinforce a feeling of separation. Covering and blocking windows robs us of a vital urban experience and diminishes the safety of the public realm.

People aren't moving into city neighborhoods to increase their sense of separation and isolation. People are searching for connection, vitality and local meaning. They are seeking interesting, pleasant and inspiring experiences. I think we can offer better than a blocked window that hides shelves of generic products offered at consistently high prices.

This is a new era — an era of re-emerging local economies, re-establishment of place and reconnection to people. I challenge CVS to rethink their urban-insertion model. It clearly doesn't work in the emerging markets. I challenge CVS to become part of the solution instead of part of the problem.



Susan Braun is executive director of Elliot Park Neighborhood Inc. (EPNI). She has a master's of architecture and specializes in neighborhood-based urban design and development.




View Comments | Post Comments
Readers have left 10 comments

VIEW COMMENTS

Sort By: Ratings | Date
Rating
Rate This
Submit

EPNI

By Dan Quirk, March 18, 2009


Sammy, EPNI is forward thinking and hiring folks with masters in architecture is an example of that. Good urban design can transform a neighborhood but most residents don't have the education to understand how to evaluate a development and make it better. This is where Susan can be vital. EPNI still has the "All Peoples Gathering" but it is now coordinated by volunteers and residents.

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

We can demand more

By Dan Quirk, March 18, 2009


To me, the blocking of windows is clearly intential on the part of CVS and other pharmacies...because they do it all the time and will only create window displays when forced too (as on Grand Ave). Whether conspiracy or not...it is not pleasing and as customers of these establishments I think we can demand better.

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

Get advice from the APA

By Kirk W., March 12, 2009


To the person who asked if there are examples of municipalities who require ground-floor transparency: The answer is a resounding, "Yes."  You can get a comprehensive list of these places, as well as excerpts from their ordinances, by asking your city's planning staff to request a "PAS Info Packet" from the American Planning Association and share it with you.  I'm sure they're members of the APA, so they receive this service free (okay, with your tax dollars).  

Another thing you might want to consider along with this initiative is a requirement to have a minimum frontage of "active uses" on street level on your primary shopping streets.  One of the many reasons malls have killed downtowns is that they have never allowed banks, offices, parking lots, etc. to interrupt the shopping experience (even if they have real pretty windows with fake plants).  While seeing the solid granite wall of a bank will certainly not make you want to cross the street and see what's on the next block, it really doesn't help much if the bank has windows--it will still hurt the retail around it if it takes up a lot of frontage.

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

When

By Sammy from the Midway, March 8, 2009


did local neighborhood groups start hiring folks with masters in architecture? I bet that comes in handy when you begin planning for next year's All Peoples Gathering?

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

I'd like to see that. . .

By Thomas Butler, March 6, 2009


As an urbanist, I appreciate Ms. Braun's commentary. To some, window design and function might seem trivial, but many of us recognize that there is such a thing as death by a thousand cuts.

As a writer, I would like to point out that language is susceptible to the same sort of degradation. A growing misuse of the word literal is an example. If "suburbanites began speaking with their feet, literally . . .", as stated in the third paragraph, I'll eat my hat - but only figuratively. 

Thank you for the article. 

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

Are there good examples?

By Susan Ingraham Bell, March 5, 2009


The issue raised in this article is one we've experienced in our community. Does anyone have examples of ordinances or design guidelines that promote window tranparency (in and out of the store) or use of the windows to actually display merchandise for sale (as opposed to lifestyled photos)?

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

what about tradition?

By Inga, March 4, 2009


I am an avid supporter of developing urban communities that have a sense of connection, and agree that store windows should provide a glimpse inside/outside. However, I would like to offer for consideration the fine historical tradition of large chain stores in urban settings using windows for the primary purpose of selling their goods. The store provides an interesting display completely geared towards the passerby, and the passerby is effectively prevented from seeing inside the store. While the author seems more focused on seeing in/out of the store, the CVS examples cited seem to be more of a comment on their aesthetics.

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

Really?

By Josh, March 4, 2009


Only one question: you wrote an article about the lack of windows, and didn't take the opportunity to use the greatest word in the English language, defenestration?  

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

Well put!

By Stephen Gross, March 3, 2009


I'm pleased to see such a thorough analysis of the window-as-urban-design. The author is absolutely correct to see in the poor design a more insidious psychological pattern. We should indeed worry about the design ethos that underlies the decision to make a "fake" window (so to speak). Urban planning, these days anyway, must be consciously done. We need a planning approval process that reaffirms good design principles.

 
Rating
Rate This
Submit

A little too much time on our hands?

By Jon Brusven, March 2, 2009


I am sympathetic to Ms Braun’s criticism of banal urban architecture, but I think she’s having an Eddie Murphy moment.  I refer, of course, to Eddie Murphy’s old joke about an uncle who saw conspiracy and racism in everything and who demanded to know why green olives were in a jar but the black olives were in a can.  One might simply see “fake windows” as poor design, or more charitably, a lazy attempt to project a more appealing façade on an urban street.   Apparently, something far more sinister is at work:  “the window has been exploited” and they are “economic agendas manifest in physical form”.  Here I thought it was just schlock architecture but those crafty corporate types have tricked us again!


 
 
MPP
Copyright 2007 Minnesota Premier Publications. 1115 Hennepin Avenue South * Minneapolis, MN 55403 * 612.825.9205 * webmaster@mnpubs.com
Southwest Journal    Downtown Journal    Minnesota Parent    Minnesota Good Age